In this episode we discuss how searching for ultimate truths ultimately gets us nowhere and what we can choose instead.
If this was expansive for you, we invite you to join us in the Immortal Odyssey Network. Inside you can binge Ryan's articles and Q+As, and interact with the community.
When you're ready to dive deeper, The Master Key: Strategic Belief Recoding + Practical Energy Mastery program is available again in October. Get on the waitlist and be in the know when the cart opens. We'd love to welcome you in.
In this episode we discuss how searching for ultimate truths ultimately gets us nowhere and what we can choose instead.
If this was expansive for you, we invite you to join us in the Immortal Odyssey Network. Inside you can binge Ryan's articles and Q+As, and interact with the community.
When you're ready to dive deeper, The Master Key: Strategic Belief Recoding + Practical Energy Mastery program is available again in October. Get on the waitlist and be in the know when the cart opens. We'd love to welcome you in.
Welcome to the immortal Odyssey podcast where we break esoteric spirituality, false light and predictive programming, and make the process of consciousness expansion tangible. I'm your host, Ryan Mintz,
Annie Earhart:together with Annie Earhart, and we are here to help you be more human.
Ryan Mintz:So we have been trying to redefine what truth is, and what categories of truth are effective and important to seek and what categories of truth get in the way of you living a human life of being able to be grounded into your body and experience the thrills of being human to the largest capacity. And we see so many different agendas that are playing out on the planet. But there's so many elements of distraction that are built into the various techniques that are used to lead people to their next truth. And we see this in the controllers and the way that the government operates and the way that the global narratives keep unfolding in lockstep and the way that people respond to them. Because it's really interesting to kind of zoom out and look at that bigger picture where you're seeing, okay, so there's another truth that just came out, there's another event that just happened that we need to spread awareness about. And there's this repeated game of, we need to be aware of this, we need to act now if we wait too long to act something, the next bad thing is going to happen. And then the next bad thing rolls around. And then these people are like, well, because you didn't do it last time. It's, it's now rolled around. But the question that I want to pose about that, in the thoughts that I want to plant into your head a little bit is, is it because that truth wasn't spoken effectively enough? Is it because people didn't listen to your good guy truth to a large enough degree that that next event happened? Or is it because you're pouring energy into these different narratives that's leading you, just like clockwork, into the things that they want you to be paying attention to and thinking about, while you think that you're spreading awareness while you think that you're helping humanity, while at the same time you're being completely ineffective at doing that? It makes a lot of sense, oh, we need to spread awareness about this thing. But very quickly, people get fatigued, they get compassion, fatigued, we're not designed to pay attention to everything. We're not designed to have compassion for everything, and everyone, we're not designed to solve everyone's problems in the entire world. So the thing that I want to speak to in this podcast today is this idea between strategic truth as being more strategic with what we embody as our truth, what we, we subscribe to as truth, what we seek out as truth, so that we can be, we can balance the scale, because what ends up happening is either you have too rigid or truth, which we're seeing in a lot of people that get fixated on certain ideas that need to be a certain way so that humanity in the world can be safe, again, are a good place to live again, or whatever distorted beliefs they have about reality right now, versus becoming super, super flexible in their truth to the point where they have no solidity to, to or substance to the platform of beliefs that they're building. And it's really easy to go to that side of things after realizing, oh, there's 8 billion people on the planet, which means there must be 8 billion different truths. And all of them are living their version of that reality. And it proves right to them based on the data that they ignore, and the data that they focus on. And it becomes a self fulfilling prophecy, prophecy. And so we have to start looking at what is the difference between truth and belief? And what is the driving mechanism for somebody to change their truth? Or to change their belief? And why should they do that? And why? How do we get them to believe a narrative or focus on data that's more empowering, as opposed to data that is just going to be more information? Because one of the things that I post on Instagram the other day is, is it beneficial to show compassion to all of these different events that are happening? And if it is beneficial by you being aware of all these things that are going on 1000s of miles away from your home? Are you actually making a change? Are you making the change that you want to make? And what is the change that you want to make? Or are you just saying, Oh, I believe that if I spread awareness that fixes the problem, eventually, and you're hoping that eventually the problem gets solved? And you just keep leaving it out into the ethers to have a coalescing of a solution for this problem, hoping that you're doing the right method to get it there. But what happens Do you see a solution actually To rise to these problems, or does that problem energetically fizzle out for the next one to arise?
Annie Earhart:Truth is an important strategic truth is and we're wanting to get to like, if your ultimate goal is to have this like really amazing, fulfilling human experience in life, what things do you focus on? And what things do you strategically ignore, and what are kind of like the the mental gymnastics of all of it.
Ryan Mintz:So talk about freedom, because to one person, you could be sitting next to somebody at a couch and one of you feels like you're imprisoned and one of you feels completely free. How is that possible, we look at the different narratives that exist in different places of the world. And there's this idea of like relative suffering. And so we end up competing with each other to say, who is suffering the most or whose suffering is worse than somebody else's, not realizing that this particular type of suffering that you as an individual go through is to you the worst kind of suffering, it is crafted such that the contrast that you experience is one that is a contrast that, that you feel as though you're suffering through whatever it is, whether it's mental anguish, or overthinking or physical pain, or whatever you through your lenses, consider as suffering. And what happens is we take our current frame of reference for what suffering is, and then compare it to what other people are going through and we say, okay, their pain is way worse than mine, they're suffering way more, or their life is way worse than mine, because they live in a third world country, not realizing that we all chose those different frames of reference to evolve aspects of our personality to evolve our genetics to evolve our being our personhood, in a very specific way. And it's not about everybody becoming rich and living on an island and having this life of leisure. It's about exploring our personhood in different contexts. And when we see those different contexts as valuable to development of personality, it is very, very different. Because what somebody thinks when they live in India, and they're working on those shipwreck, the ship graveyards, and it's a really dangerous place to work, and it's a really difficult place to live. And they make very little money, and they live in a third world environment that is toxic, and all these different dangers as a part of it. Well, we think from our first world perspective, that Oh, they live in terrible conditions, we live in this luxury, and they live in a terrible place. But what are those people express differently than we express? Well, they probably have a different kind of community that they build, they have a different kind of human connection, they have different focuses of their energy, when they're with each other. And what they talk about is completely different. What they care about is completely different. What is important to them, it changes the trajectory of their energy and their focus in a very specific way that is valuable, that you don't get when you you have everything cared for in and manicured in a very specific safe way, if you want to call it that.
Annie Earhart:So it's a very different environment. It's a different environment, very unique fulfillment that we're all after, as a human experience. And in all these different environments, you're going to be focused on different desires and wanting to craft your life in a certain way. And it all comes back to the attention that you pour into whatever is happening around you. And attention, you don't pour into other things, you make those choices. And you deal with how rigid your own truths are, versus how malleable they are in the ways that you navigate it.
Ryan Mintz:Well think about this in terms of the example that I just gave Also, if you have somebody who lives in this third world country, and they have certain beliefs about reality, that are going to alter how they experience their world, there could be somebody who works in that environment and has a happy life, they smile a lot, and they laugh a lot. And they socialize with people a lot. Whereas you could have somebody in who lives in a mansion by themselves and is miserable, who actually is living a better life in that context, who is being more human. And it's really important to see that because if we are constantly trying to rescue everyone, from their experience, if we say that people in Afghanistan have an experience that is that is not desirable to their soul, right? It might not be desirable to their human because their human has preferences and beliefs about how things should be because they're comparing, right and we get stuck in that comparison game that that is really disadvantageous, because you're not really learning the things that you came to learn in that specific environment, knowing that those things would unfold before you came down here. You then look at that other environment where where people are fulfilling themselves. It's so easy to say that environment is undesirable from my perspective, we need to change that for you. And that person is sitting there being told you're my environment is undesirable. It's going to be changed by someone changing it for me, it becomes this idea that makes sense. Of course, it becomes a self fulfilling prophecy, a truth of some kind where somebody is like, these people are having a hard time. And we're being told to raise awareness about it, and we need to save them from it. And they want to be saved. Therefore, this is the right move to do. And we're missing that there are 7 billion different realities and versions of that in context where the more we give people their own power to have the experience that they're having, even if it's not desirable, even if it's not the most beautiful, cleanest, pain free experience that someone can have humans love their suffering, humans love the things that they think they don't want to have happened. And we love these stories. And that's why these narratives and these control mechanisms really work to distract us because they, they get us involved emotionally and energetically in something that is entertaining and engaging that we like to imagine ourselves being a part of, in some way. We like watching movies and seeing the main character have all of these obstacles and events that happen, where we're like, oh, I don't want to have adventure in my life. And I have a really a life of freedom and ease life without consequences. And that's kind of the amorphous idea that they hold on to. And they're like, Okay, well, if we spread enough truth, if enough people have truth, we're going to, we're going to awaken the new earth. And when the New Earth Awakens, there's going to be no more oppression, there's going to be no more suffering, there's going to be no more pain, there's going to be none of these things that are actually really important mechanisms of how our world works. And not because there's oppression, not because there's evil, those things are not evil, they're things that we desire. They're things that we want to feel oppressed, people
Annie Earhart:love to be the underdog, people love to feel a pushing against, because then you get to have the experience of you know, writing, maybe a moral high horse or something. And this is not a popular opinion, it's that people love their suffering, because you get a certain type of emotional, experiential itch that is scratched by feeling like, Oh, I'm so oppressed,
Ryan Mintz:it's the same thing. People love being angry, they think they don't want to be angry. And then they purposefully shorten their fuse under certain circumstances, when beliefs need to come to the surface for examining, and they miss this most of the time, like when somebody wants to be angry, they're not thinking about what their truth is, they're not thinking about their beliefs, they want to feel angry. And then not only do they like poke the business, so that they can bring to the surface the thing they want to be angry about. And therefore they create a scenario that they can be angry, and get to feel that feeling well saying, I don't want to be angry, I want you to make me feel better. So what do they want, they want to be made to feel better, they want to feel angry, they want to have all these feelings that they say they don't want. But really, they, they want that story. They want those experiences, they want that enrichment of energy, maybe because they feel like the energy is too quiet. Or they they and this is mostly subconscious. They don't know usually why they want to feel anger, partially because they judge anger is bad. And of course, all these things that we judge is bad we secretly want we secretly wish we could be that we secretly wish we could express that way we see we judge it, we judge ourselves for it. It's so
Annie Earhart:subconscious that you might hear this and be like, no way, no way. But the truth is we have a lot of desires that we repress, because we judge them as no good and being angry and feeling like you're on a high horse and feeling like you're morally superior, those things are delicious to a part of you. And it's really worth it to admit that to yourself. And because from there you can you're in a position of giving yourself those things in a more healthy way in a more conscious way. Instead of letting them squeak out sideways and just like wreak havoc in relationships and things like that,
Ryan Mintz:we want those bad things to happen. And part of us always does we want that disadvantageous event or that disadvantageous feeling or the antagonism to what we say we want to occur. And it's really hard for people to admit that to themselves until they sit back and actually go through some of the exercises that I teach in the master key and they realize Holy crap, I did kind of want that. And and I wanted all of those things that either happened or that I was afraid would happen. And when you start to explore that, you can actually start to dismantle some of those desires. And I'm not going to go into that too deeply now because it's so deeply covered in the master key, but just planting that seed that people want the things they think they don't want
Annie Earhart:it. So let's talk about some of these truth paradigms that exist currently and evaluate them just a little bit. So there's a couple of these stories. So one is a story of controllers who have orchestrated an elaborate group project in which they're literally like manipulating poisoning and controlling the people.
Ryan Mintz:Let's well so let's elaborate so people know what we're actually talking about. So you have this idea that there's an Illuminati group is the best way to describe it that runs all of the major governments of the world. It runs all the major banking institutions, and it's got people who, let's say billionaires and and other puppeteers, that are in control that are making decisions for humanity that best serve the controllers. And okay, it makes a lot of sense when you've you've been falling prey to the predictive programming, since you were a child. And they've been pumping ideas into your head about all these different how the government is spying on everybody how you're always at risk of the government overhearing something in the government showing up to your house, you're afraid of authority, and they plant these seeds of, of respecting and fearing authority from the time that you're a child. And so you have these other things that are planted subconsciously, that run as you're just interacting with your daily life. And now you have all these truths are showing up on social media that are talking about, well, if we don't act, now, we're going to be imprisoned. If you don't listen to this truth and spread this awareness, we're going to walk right into your next prison. And then they show quotes from like Orwell and some of those predictive programming books that were made, saying, Oh, well, this is happening. It's like, Okay, well, you're on one side of the coin, you have this idea that this group of controllers is working on a group project, when no time in the history of schooling has a group project had had everybody participate in that group project. So the fact that so many people are participating in this group project and collaborating effectively on this project is extraordinary. So that alone is kind of one of those things that makes me wonder is this just humans who are trying to keep their life afloat at a certain level, and they're, they're banking on other humans keeping their life at a certain level, and they happen to have enough control at at at the levels of government and whatever else that they're fighting for that control, as humanity is, is waking up? Well, let's go step higher. It's not just humanity's waking up. And the controllers are not either everyone is getting this influx of frequency or nobody is it's even if they're interdimensional ETS, they're getting the influx of frequency the same way we are, it's not just humans who are getting activated and dogs are not and and the controllers are not. So let's look at it through that lens where everyone is waking up. Well, if everyone's waking up, and they had orchestrated this whole plan to keep people under lock and key and imprisoned. Well, I grew up my whole life living a pretty great living, you know, besides all the obstacles that I faced having opportunities and things to explore, and being able to travel and being able to do human things in the world. And you're telling me I've been in prison the whole time. That sounds like a great prison. And there's so many prisoners in jail, like real prison who don't want to leave prison for lockdowns because prison, they don't have to care about rent, they don't have to worry about their food, and they can sit and have leisure time. 24 seven. So all of these people who are like I want freedom, I want more leisure time, I want to be able to just relax, I don't want to have to work all the time. And then there at the same time afraid of going to prison. It's kind of ironic, because prison would be a solution to the thing they think they want. They want to sit and meditate all day, they want to sit and go within and not have to worry about some of the other worldly things. It's like, okay, let's say that the world does go forward with the controllers agenda, where they're like agenda 2030 agenda 21, where they're trying to take over all the farmland and convert it to synthetic meats. And they're eventually trying to push the trend, the tech, the technocratic and transhuman agenda, which you know, let's say that vaccines are the beginning of that. And the synthetic foods are the are the next step. And heavy metals have been a part of that where they're trying to adjust our physiology. Right. And remember, this is one truth. There's so many different stories here. But I want to point out one truth that I think is important to look at, that they're trying to adjust our physiology, physiology, they're giving us heavy metals to get our body acclimated to having metal and electronics in our systems or system doesn't reject it. They're putting technology into us through these new techniques, these new vaccine technologies
Annie Earhart:and Elon Musk's brain chip implants and all this AI stuff that's coming out as part of that as well.
Ryan Mintz:Right. And so now we start to connect these dots right where humans telling stories that are connecting all of these dots, where we see these pieces of the puzzle puzzle as far as toxins, these pieces of the puzzle as far as frequency manipulation of the planet, and all of these are effectively stories, right? They're all invisible toxins. So this idea that heavy metal poisoning this idea of toxins in the air, toxins in the water, fluoridated water, these are all things that have been pumped through predictive programming and TV shows and things for a very long time. And through the nutrition industry and whatever else and they are invisible. There's no real way to prove that they have any effect on a living body. And the problem is, it has nothing to do with the existence of those things. It has to do with what we believe those things do and what they harm us with. So what has happened over time is, is stories have been told. And it's not that the story is revealing a truth, right? There's this idea in predictive programming that these black magicians have to tell us the truth, in order for their magic to work in order for us to fall for it, but why, but why would they have to tell us the truth? I mean, I can do magic without telling anybody the truth or telling anybody what I'm doing.
Annie Earhart:So you're talking about all of that, like 1960s this movie was made that shows all the things that are unraveling now, or,
Ryan Mintz:and it's not to say that there's not like lies that have been told or truths that have been revealed. But it makes me wonder a little bit that okay, they've been planting these seeds through like project Mockingbird, and some of these MK Ultra type technologies that are constantly planting belief seeds in people, right, they plant the belief that fluoride is in our water, fluoride has an extra electron because it has that extra electron, it's stealing hydrogen from some of our other cells. When it steals hydrogen it causes it causes the cells to dehydrate and calcify. And we can tell this whole story about what we think is happening as a result of having fluoride in our system,
Annie Earhart:or just like calcify. I think even simpler, most people are afraid of fluoride because it will calcify your pineal gland,
Ryan Mintz:right. And so there's, there's this whole idea that fluoride and some of these other toxins specifically target your pineal gland. And without that you're connected, you're disconnected from your soul, because your soul only connects to you through that one little pea pod in the center of your brain. And that is, that works really well for people because they've been brought up to understand energy as like only the primary energy centers. They think that the pineal gland is this some mystical third eye, that our mind resides in its connection to our soul in that location, and then energy, or information, or downloads or whatever, fly through our pineal and if that's calcified, we're missing out on our downloads, we don't get any ideas, we have no imagination, we have no connection to our soul. It's just because people don't understand the energy mechanics that they get lost in some of that mumbo jumbo really, that isn't really that important, because our mind is everywhere in our body, it's fused into our nervous system, and even deeper into the energy pathways that inform how the nervous system works.
Annie Earhart:And we go into that in the master key plenty, plenty, plenty. So let's let's keep talking about like truth or accounts, for example, the connecting consciousness account on Instagram, it's all of these, like, things you have been lied about, and all these things you should watch out for. But there's never really any solutions to those things. And it's kind of an attention sock. And a certain way to plant these belief seeds that make you afraid of a morphus stuff.
Ryan Mintz:We have accounts like that, that claim to be truth or accounts that come up with all this information that to some extent is provable. But to some extent, it's also it could not matter. They're talking about toxins in our food, they're talking about how these things have been orchestrated to poison us all along. And on one hand, you can find truth in that. And what happens when you find truth in that you start to look into nutrition, you start to look into all these things, you become hyper concerned about the water that they use to make your coffee with in the morning, or the water that you're showering in, or the way the oils that they use for their to make their food or the type of meat that where they get their meat from and you become hypercritical about all these things. And what happens, your body starts reacting to that food a little bit differently. And you start to have symptoms of having eaten something potentially poisonous, and your body reacts faster and faster. So instead of your body training, you're training it to exactly your body instead of like when you were a kid when you could eat anything. You've been inundated with all of these beliefs about all these poisons and toxins and things along. And so your truth becomes that there's all these poisons and toxins out there and that you need certain supplements to save you from all those toxins. Well, the supplement industry is no different from the pharmaceutical industry, they are the same industry, they are selling the same kind of concept. They want people to think that you can just take supplements forever, not realizing that supplements are information just like any kind of chemical structure is information that causes your body to balance its frequency in one way or another. And when you're balancing it in one way or another your body's going to have it's going to adapt to that. eventually it's going to say Oh, I didn't have that information. I needed that information to become regulated. And I got the benefit from it. Oh, but I'm still getting this supplement. Okay, I guess I just don't need to produce it anymore because the supplement is giving me that information instead of me needing to provide it for myself and then your body goes out of balance once more but you don't realize it because you've been taking the supplement the whole time. And then you stop taking the supplement. You notice Oh wait, that thing that I was getting benefit from my body went out of whack again because I stopped taking the supplement when it's really because you didn't teach your body to use the The information in the supplement adequately. So which is the truth? And where do we? Where do we draw the line with where we seek truth and where we realize that knowing more actually ends up, making your choices more complicated ends up making your life more complicated. So coming back to some of these truths or accounts that are always sharing what you know, they're like, you're being lied to about this, you're being poisoned in this way. It's planting seeds where you think you're being poisoned in that way. It's planting seeds where you think you're being lied to about all these things. And on one hand, it makes sense, oh, I'm finding out all this truth, I am becoming more empowered to know all these things. But really, you're just having more places for your energy delete, you're having more places for that are not entirely empowering. Now what happens? Let's say we didn't learn that, let's say, there's all these truths, or accounts that are sharing this information that are sharing awareness about government tyranny, and whatever else, let's say that they stopped sharing awareness that say they just started being human again. And they were sharing what they were up to. And they went back to normal Instagram accounts that were living a normal life, and they didn't share stuff, like the poisons in the water, and they didn't share stuff, like what's going on in Afghanistan? Would that mean that that stuff causes more damage to humanity? Or does that mean that that stuff doesn't get planted as a seed, and so it stops damaging humanity? Because people are not energizing that belief? Now, what's the difference between belief and truth? Well, when something is true for somebody, it means they've cultivated beliefs around that concept about how that thing interacts with them. So if your truth is that there's this evil organization that is controlling humanity that's been poisoning us and dumbing us down for a really long time, and it's been making us sick. Well, there's these, then how do you interact with everything you enter, you interact with, like, when you go to a restaurant, you're going to interact differently with people, if people are enforcing a rule, you're going to interact differently with them, you're going to interact in a very particular way, when you think that there's tyranny lurking around any corner, then if you know that you're empowered, and you can interact with humans as humans, and that every human has a different truth, and they have a different experience of reality, and that their experience of reality is valid, and that maybe there are more advantageous versions of beliefs and truths that they could live on. But it doesn't matter. It doesn't matter. You don't need to change their belief in order for them to live a human life for them to learn the lessons that they need to learn. So let's take the noise away. Let's say there aren't all these people spreading awareness. There's not all these bandwagons for people to get on and teach people about that all of this information becomes irrelevant that we don't need, we don't need to be inundated with with stories, right? Their story like all these ETS that are working in or dimensionally that are working to help evolve human consciousness. And on one side, there's these fatally or evil ETS that are controlling him, humans and hijacking them and taking them over and making them make all these crazy decisions. And this is just happened over the last couple of years. Or it's been orchestrated for 50 to 100,000 years over the course of all these different iterations of ages of humanity. And yeah, these are cool. When somebody tells the story from the beginning 10 you're like, Oh, this makes a lot of sense. That's how we got here. But at the same time, it is entirely possible that before 150 to 200 years ago, everything we think is history, everything that we think humans have been through every experience you think humans had is completely made up? Let's pause
Annie Earhart:for a moment and really think about, does it matter, say humanity likes restarts every 200 years even like, does it matter for you living your life as the best human going after the fulfillment that you uniquely desire? All this stuff? Does it truly matter?
Ryan Mintz:Well, let's go to the extreme. Let's say that this is a simulation, right? So let's say this is a this let's say this is a flat earth simulation. Even the clouds in the sky is fake. It's a projection map that is contained in this the single unit, it is a simulation. And we are here interacting. And let's say that this simulation has new iterations are new narrative underlying narratives that shift every few 100 years. So what happens we as humans have incarnated into different timelines on different versions of this flat earth and different simulations. So in these different simulations, that all exists simultaneously, you have simulations that are simulating this type of culture, you have simulations that are simulating this type of technology, they're simulating this type of human interaction. And throughout history, we've had those different circumstances. So humans could have experienced plague, they could experience a dictatorship, they could experience a type of hardship they could experience living off the land in a really positive way. They could experience peace, they could experience abundant wealth, they could experience extraordinary technology. And all of these exists simultaneously. And so right now we are in a transition period in which these ages are changing. So we have the old age that we are evolving out of, and we're experiencing the transition zone between the, the old and the new. And inside of that transition zone, all these stories of every different zone is overlapping. So we have this idea that this, we have to get time, right, we have to make sure that this is right. And it's like we're getting all the inundated with, with all the possible narratives that could happen. all the possible futures, all the different probable events that could be unfolding right now. And human consciousness at the same time is changing. So we're seeing that out picturing on the planetary surface as these things unfold while we ourselves are changing. And we're getting too fixated on what is truth, not realizing that we came here to have a different kind of experience. So you can either come into an experience that is inside the container of that 200 year period. Or you could come in and have an experience that's in the transition between the two periods. Right, so let's go back 1000 years, 1000 years, there was a pivot point right between that 200 year reign, maybe that that was right now it's happening globally. But maybe it didn't always happen globally, it happened in segments or whatever it was, but we chose instead of to Inc. Well, we probably chose to incarnate in the middle of it as well. But if we chose to incarnate in the transition period, we're incarnating. For a very specific thing, we either incarnate to hold a frequency to allow this transition to happen, or reincarnate to experience what it means to be in limbo, we're in a transition, we experienced the loss of identity that happens, the transformation of identity that happens, the transformation of us having to let go of the old way of living, imagine we are souls having a human experience, imagine we came into a simulation, and we want to be here and that all of these are valid and valuable. Well go into the future in which we are living in a transhuman society, in which humans get to experience augmenting with technology and having extraordinary intelligence that they're connected to in real time. And their their technology has allowed them to heal their physical body in a super certain way, or a future in which we have superpowers or a future in which we are hybridized with animals in some way. And that these are all amazing experiences for consciousness, like why would consciousness not want to have the experience of having a partial human partial robotic experience where they're super strong and super intelligent and super effective at whatever it is that that allows them to be? Those are things that are kind of fascinating for consciousness to explore, when you stop saying, Oh, well, I'm gonna lose my humanity, or I'm gonna lose my identity, or I'm gonna lose my connection to my soul. What if you can't break your connection to your soul, and that then changes all of these different fears that you have about the transition period, the vaccine, the government tyranny, all these things that might be transitioning us into that next place, none of this can be proven. But which one which of these stories which of these points of view, which of these ways of looking at reality allows you to interact with your reality in a more empowered way,
Annie Earhart:it kind of begs the question of how does your day to day life change when your truth is a little bit more flexible versus rigid when you're like, locking on to one of these narratives and going full steam ahead with it like thinking that all your all the water is poisoned? All this stuff is poison? How does it change your day to day experience when you are a little bit more allowing for those things to be more malleable. So this
Ryan Mintz:is one of the consequences of the master key when you when you start to know what you believe when you start to really because most people before they take the master key, they kind of maybe have an idea of beliefs, but they don't really know what they believe. And so when you really start to dig into what you believe, and you start seeing it everywhere, you start seeing it in yourself, you start seeing it in your partners, you start seeing it in the mainstream narratives. And now instead of it actually making you more empowered initially gives you too many choices. You have an overload of information that you haven't learned how to integrate and process yet. And this is one of the challenges of the master key that it does really expand your consciousness in a really in a tangible and powerful way. And most people love the idea of expanded consciousness, not realizing that it actually is more information and data to process and more connection to process. When we're looking at all of these different narratives. Understanding how to craft your truth strategically can be very empowering. So part of what we do when we start speaking about these beliefs and things in the master key is the next step is then cultivating your specific truth, which means making choices. You need to make choices about what is true and what isn't. So coming back to the ideas that are presented in some of these truths or accounts, does believing what they are presenting make you more healthy. Does it make you more empowered to interact with your life? Or does it give you more negative variables to sift through Because what we don't want is to add more negative variables, we want to make choices about our body, our beliefs, so that when we interact with something, some of those choices are already pre determined on our behalf. So when we're choosing our truth, what we are doing is we're making choices ahead of time, so that when an interaction comes into our life, we've already chosen what is true for us, so we know how to interact. Now what ends up happening is if you haven't chosen your truth, when you go to speak to somebody who has an oppositional truth, you are feeling both what your truth is, and what their truth is, and the conflict between them. And you're allowing that to blend into your identity. And there's nothing wrong with listening to their truth, right? There's nothing wrong with hearing other people's truth, I think it's a good thing to allow your truth to expand. But the only way you're actually going to receive their truth is if you recognize that all truth is, is worthy. All truth is real to the person who holds that perspective. But it doesn't need to be threatening, it does not need to be information that is threatening to you. So when you are you've chosen your truth when you choose what to believe, right? So let's look at fluoride. For example, if you're constantly afraid of fluoride, you're constantly afraid of heavy metals and toxins, endotoxins, all these different things that are supposedly lacing our food, well, you are creating a reason for your body to react to those things, when it may in the past not have been reacting to it. So zooming out a little bit further, when we look at nutrition, especially our beliefs about our body's capability, or beliefs about toxins or beliefs about what foods are good for us our beliefs about what foods our body can process all of that changes how our physiology processes, the information that is contained in that food. And so if we are constantly adopting beliefs, that things are poisonous and dangerous, we are telling our body, hey, this thing is poisonous or dangerous. So what does our body do, it fulfills our belief that that thing is dangerous, and gives us a reaction to the thing that we're putting on to our into our body. So what's a better truth to adopt that my body is resilient, or that there's all these toxins that my body has to fight. So if I'm constantly needing to fight, guess what I'm draining my energy, I'm having to fight all these things. I'm constantly pouring my focus into potential illness. And my body's constantly having symptoms that I have to fight as a result of that.
Annie Earhart:So it's the same idea is like two people are sitting at a table, and each of them has a piece of chocolate cake in front of them. And they're both about to eat it. And one person believes that they're being really bad, because maybe they're on a diet or whatever. And they believe that sugar is going to spike certain things and have this adverse reaction or adverse influence on what they're trying to do. versus another person that is like, Oh, my gosh, I'm so excited to eat this cake. The way each of those people's bodies receives that cake, is going to be vastly different because of the beliefs they hold. And that's kind of what you're exactly what you're talking about. And their
Ryan Mintz:truth that they have chosen, whether they chose it consciously or unconsciously dictates that, and that then causes them to feel certain emotions, it causes them to have certain thoughts when they look at that piece of cake. And so part of what I want to introduce people to in this particular podcast is being more strategic with what you're choosing to believe. Which means being more strategic with the stories that you tell, which means noticing the stories that you tell, because if you don't really know what your truth is about all of these things, then you end up getting lost and every new truth that gets presented, you end up looking for the next truth, you end up getting addicted to information. And you don't then take that step back and say, Okay, I need to determine what I want to be true for me, because people don't realize they can do that. Like they're looking for the truth. And they're like oh, I found out these things were lies and they were believing one thing about nutrition for a while men are new thing comes up and they believe that and they suddenly the old thing is is an evil and and they then go on this rampage, trying to fight the old thing, not realizing that that old thing worked for them for a while until they realize a new story. And the only thing that changed was the story.
Annie Earhart:Yeah. So you go from like, a keto diet to a paleo diet to a way back when Atkins or whatever it is. Yeah, and you keep like finding new things. And you're like, oh, what I was doing was really, like uninformed, and kind of silly and it was really hurting me, I need to do this new thing because it this is the truth. And ultimately, that's not useful. And I think we're all conditioned to just keep ravenously going after the truth with a capital T.
Ryan Mintz:And the irony about this is that at the most fundamental level, either the things that they are arguing about are completely unprovable, like no matter how much you think you're coming up with evidence for it, it still cannot be proven to somebody who has certain beliefs because if they have beliefs that conflict with what you're trying to prove, they're going to ignore Any conflicting data anyway, the same thing anybody does that, that when something conflicts with what they believe they just ignore the data that conflicts with it. And it's that simple. That's why it's so easy to to get people into a tunnel vision, just by telling these stories because people don't think in those terms of, of their beliefs that are being adopted by preaching to the choir the way that they are. So coming back to the nutrition for a second, just because these are really good examples of rigid versus fixed truth. Most people are really dogmatic about their their nutrition. And their there's so much logic and science that gets developed for supplementation for nutrition for whatever it is, they don't realize that the fundamental principles that they are basing their science on that they're basing their logic on, are completely made up and ideas. So let's talk about calories. For example, in nutrients as an example, and I've talked about this, I think, highlights on social media, there's this idea that there are calories and food. And so I was like, Okay, how did they come up with? Like, how did they figure out there were calories and food? How do they measure that? How did they attribute that to the nutrition label and know that a potato has this kind of calories, and a steak has this kind of calories in this kind of food that has all these other complex things, and it has this many calories? So I looked it up, and they burn it? It's like, okay, I've heard the idea of burning calories. And I was like, Okay, that makes sense. When does my body burn anything? So literally burned. So So fire. So this is how they determine calories in your food, is they literally put it over a plasma flame, and they see the the change in change in energy that's given off the change in heat that's given off something along those lines, but they basically literally burn the food. So at no time when we ingest food, do we actually burn it, we have a chemical reaction. And we are living systems that are processing the information contained in that food at no time does that food go over a flame and are often energy. So it's a completely like mismatching concept that that has been attributed. The second piece is all of the nutrients and nutrition labels and things that are that people use on their supplements that they use on foods off the shelf that they use on organic foods, whatever it is, all of that is information taken out of a database. So nobody has the systems themselves, where they determine what the nutrients and things are in those foods and what those nutrients are made of and what those nutrients do.
Annie Earhart:So basically, someone built this idea of this, they have measured some some burnt food and figured out a number to put on that a caloric number and then everyone else in the whole entire world is going off of that database
Ryan Mintz:to some extent so so you have a couple of components, you have the calories, which are determined by burning. And then you have a mission spectra spectroscopy, which is they basically put different foods or nutrients into a plasma jet also. And they see what colors and things that it gives off. And based on the colors that it gives off, they say okay, that contains these things. Well, that begs the question of how do they know that those things? Are those colors? And how do they know that those things are contained in that way when when it's burned? How do they know it's not changing when they go to, and they have new technologies, like with magnetic resonance type things, but they're still basing it off of that original assessment? A lot of things to take for granted. Well, let's zoom out one more time, where did the emission spectroscopy come from? That was how they started measuring the what is contained in notes, what was measured in distant planets, and fabulous and, and all of those are like
Annie Earhart:how much helium is in that planet however many light years away, right. And
Ryan Mintz:so they measure the elements in the periodic table and, and came up with the elements in the periodic table and all of these different ideas that are based on these fundamental concepts. So So bringing that back into our food, they have taken a concept drew a picture about what that concept kind of means, built a process to determine something. And they've attributed that to our health. And they've attributed that to our bodily function. But the only place they have ever been able to assess these things like mitochondria, the only place they've really assessed mitochondrial function is in dead tissue. And so they've looked under an electron microscope at of mitochondria. And they said, Okay, this squiggly line is this this squiggly line is this this squiggly line does this, but they're looking at squiggly lines on a microscope. And that doesn't actually tell them what any of those functions are. They've made up and told a story about what those functions are, and then sold products and science that says these things do these things. You need to support these ideas, these things. And it's all based on these fundamental made up narratives that some scientists are Some controllers, or some people with an agenda made up and I see it all the time, especially in nutrition science, especially in bodily function, where they make up words, they they make up, they make up receptor sites, they make up fancy words, they make up all these new concepts. So when they say, Oh, this thing that you were eating last year, you're supplementing vitamin D last year, and that's actually rat poison. And, and now, when you take in that particular vitamin T, it binds to interleukin 84. And when it binds to interleukin 84, it causes all these other and they make up all kinds of receptors and words and numbers and, and pathways that this stuff comes through. And there's always a new pathway, there's always a new word, there's always a new concept. And it's like, okay, but you've never looked in a living body, to see how those things communicate and how those things pass through, and how those things are actually broken down.
Annie Earhart:And not only that, most people would not do all of the research that you literally that you just spoke out, right? Most people just kind of take it at face value and are like, oh, okay, I need more vitamin D.
Ryan Mintz:And the problem with that is they don't realize that the supplement industry and the nutrition industry, in the pharmaceutical industry, in the farming industry, all of them are the same. And so they come out with these stories, oh, Bill Gates is buying all the farmland, it's like, Yeah, he already owned all the farmland, he already was doing that. He already had money in Tyson Foods and all these huge, huge mega corporations that that do industrial farming. And so all of these narratives come out strategically at strategic times, to cause people to adopt a rigid truth about certain concepts that are made up. And so the idea is that we want to make our truth less rigid, but not so flexible, that we have no guidelines, right, so we have the on one end of the spectrum, our constraints get too rigid and too strict, that we end up actually hurting ourselves as a result of those beliefs. And on the other end, we become too flexible, where we're allowing too many pieces of data, we're allowing too many conflicting things to exist in our field, instead of choosing what to filter out, so we need to refine our filter a little bit and learn how to make choices. So what we do here, when you have that level of awareness, and you're starting to have all you're starting to realize that your nutrition feedback that you get from your body is based on belief, you're realizing that the way that your body moves and functions is based on what you believe about it. And whether you're afraid of pain, or you're whether you have all these other traumas that you're trying to protect or heal in your body. And, and so those alter how you move and ultra where your body creates tension, where energy builds up in certain areas of your body, and those then change your emotional pathways, they change your energy pathways, they change where your focus and coming back to our attention, you have mental attention, but you also a physical attention. And so when your body is constantly working on all of these different things, because your beliefs are so convoluted, and and have too much noise, you have too many different things going on simultaneously, even subconsciously. So it's not like consciously, you might already have a squirrel brain where you're bouncing all over the place where your body is doing the same thing. Because what's happening in your mind is going to be happening in your body to some extent. So being able to calm both the mind and the body by pre determining what information you're going to engage with. Now, that doesn't mean that any new information you ignore, but it changes how you process new information. You're not constantly looking for that next piece of information to make you feel safe. you cultivate safety within so that the information doesn't threaten your freedom or safety because it's so easy for people to say, oh, our freedoms being threatened, oh, tyranny is coming in. They're going to take over the world. They're going to mandate all these things. We need to speak up, we need to fight. And yet nobody's fighting. nobody's doing anything besides speaking up. And it's the same thing they want. They want people to do that. They want people spreading awareness. They want people to march and sing and protest. Because it's ineffective. It does not change anything. All you're doing is marching and singing. And there's no threat to that. And when did that start that started after World War Two. They didn't want people uprising anymore. So what did they do? They staged the whole Martin Luther King thing, who was a communist, sorry, if you like Martin Luther King, but he was a communist, you can do your research on it. And he staged all of these different events and they staged all these protests and he was on the inside the whole time. And and so they staged all of these events. And he taught people to marchin sing. And so now what happened when the George Floyd incident, people were marching in singing and nothing really happened. They just gave through people a bone here and there without actually changing anything. And then the same thing continues on during COVID. Anytime there is an event, people start squawking off, they start marching and singing, but on social media instead of in the streets.
Annie Earhart:So it's a harmless way for people to off gas essentially, is what you mean. It's been like presented as this world changing thing, but it's really just a way to capture all that excess.
Ryan Mintz:It captures a tremendous amount of attention, right? So you start so what happens when you mark Seeing you call attention to something what happens when your attention is called to something does your energy increase or does your energy decrease it, it decreases it. And so if you are perpetually pouring energy into the next narrative, you're perpetually pouring energy into things that you don't want. While thinking that energy is going to fix them, we need to be able to filter, the type of energy that we pour into different places intentionally, we need to know where we're pouring our energy. And that's the it's so easy to get stuck in this fear loop where you're telling this story of oppression of danger. And if we don't know, then you're going to get stuck. But the thing is blissful ignorance is blissful ignorance, when you are able to step away from those narratives, and not be aware of not only not be aware of them, but not even worry about the fact that you don't know something, then all of that attention that you are wasting on that other thing, you can refocus into your life, you can refocus on what you want to build. And you can actually get back to living the life that you want to live without permission from these external sources.
Annie Earhart:And the other piece of that, of course, is cultivating the skill of self refocusing, because all of these narratives, they're so entertaining, oh, my God, they are so entertaining. And it's so easy to just like, dive in into those rabbit holes and go, go go. And then Oh, you were on your phone for eight hours today, you know, like and not doing the things that you say you really want to do. So it comes back to your attention, and masterfully holding unwavering attention in things and plugging energy leaks that you would otherwise just go down those rabbit holes.
Ryan Mintz:And there's nothing wrong with entertainment. There's nothing wrong with wanting to be entertained by these stories. But what we want to understand is, when are you being entertained by him for the sake of entertainment. And when are you subconsciously worried about not knowing the right piece of information or being late to knowing the right piece of information so that you miss something that will allow you to be safe at the next juncture of events.
Annie Earhart:And then you're like scramble, scramble, scramble, gotta hurry, catch up on all this stuff. And it just it leads to burnout.
Ryan Mintz:And you're already running that energy, you're already running that that energy of missing it, you're already running that energy of falling behind, you're already running that energy of not enough ness that you're trying to fill by finding all this information and all the truth that's out there. And so can you step away from the need to find that information while still being entertained? And while recognizing whether you're taking away from the life that you want to live by thinking, Oh, well, I can't live that life until I know these things about these things. Otherwise, I won't make the right decisions, assuming some of your decisions are right, and some of them are wrong. And how do you then now recognizing that you're doing that to some extent? How do you step out of that narrative? So how do you stop searching for truth? How do you stop constantly information hunting? And then how do you bridge the gap between where you are now in the the amount of information that you think you need? So if you think you need this big pot of information to do the thing you want to do? Could you still in some way, do the thing you want to do without all that information? And have you sat with that? Can you sit down and say okay, I think I need all these things. I think I need all this information. I think I need all this knowledge, I think I need all this awareness, I think I need all this preparation. What could I do without those things? What could I build without those things? Could I still build it and learn as I go and might I learn something different as a result of going that route that will be more authentic to me, and not me just preaching to the choir. Because one of the things that I see so prevalent in the truth or movement is the truth or speak to people who already know some of it, they're already open to what that person's truth is, most of these truths are speaking to people who already know the truth sense that that already know that truth, or already sense that truth, or are looking for more information around that idea. Very rarely does someone sharing that that type of truth or that type of awareness, get to someone who doesn't already want that piece of information, most of the people who are against that type of awareness are just going to reject it outright. and ignore it is conflict. Because it conflicts with their beliefs. So it's really important to recognize that if you are spreading awareness, because you think it's really important and that you're you're reaching people and resonating, you are just resonating the people who already resonating, you're not actually adding to the pot of people who need that information. So it's important to then readjust and say okay, it's not about truth. It's not about spreading awareness. It's about reaching the people who have a different kind of awareness. And then asking yourself is, is it because I'm uncomfortable looking at them in their current reality and their current awareness because it makes me uncomfortable to see them in that situation. While they think they're actually doing the right thing. So who there is when who there is at a disadvantage, the person is trying to convince the other person that their belief is wrong, that their belief is dangerous, not the person who is in there. reality. So our goal here is to come into your reality so that you're always empowered within your reality regardless of the truth that you adopt. One of those things that I want people to really grasp is an ability not only to see that there are so many different truths out there. And because there's so many different truths out there, it's okay for them to exist. And when you start to realize, okay, the truth that your parents hold the truth that your partner's hold the truth that your friends hold the truth that your family holds, even if they're all different, it's still, you can still be safe when they disagree. And they may not even know that there are different truths and that it's okay, so let's say that you know, that they're different truths. And they don't, well, you can still be steadfast in what you know, while allowing them to exist in what they know without that creating conflict. Because if you're constantly trying to change everyone's truth, if you're constantly trying to be the hero and everyone else's story, because you believe your truth is a better truth and more right, and more truthful, then you're wasting a huge amount of energy, and really acting in a disempowered way to try and convince all these people. Now at the same time, some people just don't know. But there's a very different energy when you go to interact with somebody who just doesn't know, versus somebody who is convicted in their beliefs already, and you're trying to convince them distort them. The conversation happens very differently when someone just hasn't formed an opinion yet, recognizing that energetically when you go to interact with people is important, because that's where we start to control the conversation in a more effective way. And control our truth in which things we need to stand rigid in and where we need to be flexible, where we need to release a little bit where we need to hold on a little bit so that as that tug of war happens in that conversation, we're a little bit more agile and flexible, we're not fighting over a truth that is too rigid. We are trying to find common ground and reconnect with people, and empower people so that they can live their best life, not your best life, right, you're like, Oh, well, you're preventing my freedom, I need you to be this way so that I can feel good, I need you to know these things and believe these things, because I'm saying that you're going to be empowered and knowing them, but really, I feel uncomfortable, and you're not knowing them. And the reality is, it's just you feel uncomfortable. So your goal is to feel comfortable. And then the rest of it becomes irrelevant, not for them to believe what you need them to believe. So you can rescue humanity so that you can spread awareness because none of that actually matters. All of those humans chose that particular experience and whatever circumstances evolve as a result of that. And at the end of the day, if people are walked into a prison, and totalitarian regime of some kind, and they don't know it, if they don't know it, and they are happy, and they're living their lives again, let people enjoy their things, then don't let people enjoy their garbage, let people live their life, let people have their experiences, all of those are valid, all of those are good, you do not need to steamroll them into being a different way. If they can work. It is not bad. That peep like from your perspective, you're like, Oh, those people are in prison, those people are walking right into into the the sheep pen. And you're the one who is fixated on the narratives. You're the one who is constantly trying to rescue You're the one who is trying to warn everybody about these things. So who really is in a prison who really feels in prison who really feels trapped? It's you because you feel powerless because of what everyone else is doing. So how do you change that you empower yourself. So I'm going to leave you guys with that today. We kind of bounced around a little bit in today's podcast, bunch of different things. But I hope that what you get out of this is this idea that truth can be a little bit more flexible. You don't want it to be so flexible, that it doesn't give you the right constraints. But you want to use your truth as a lens to say, Okay, what do I believe about these situations? What do they believe about these situations? Can I just see what those beliefs are and recognize that the belief creates the reality, I don't need to go rescue everybody from their beliefs I can, I can empower myself to show up more fully. And when I empower myself to show up more fully that radiates a frequency that affects people in the way that I want to affect them without me needing to actually convince them of anything. So same thing I teach for people working with their parents is you're never going to convince anybody of everything of anything, you're not going to tell them anything that's that's going to overwrite beliefs that they have in conflict with what you see. So the only way to demonstrate that for them is to show up in body the only way to demonstrate that for them is to be convicted in what you believe and hold that frequency. When you speak when you interact, whatever that means. And then that bleeds into their life that gets them to ask the questions they need to ask not by you pointing it out, not by you shining light on things. It's only by you showing up and being human that allows other people to recognize distortions and incongruities in the different narratives and truths that exist so that they can refine their own truth. So I hope you guys enjoyed today's podcast. If you want to dig deeper and Really refining what you believe to know what your truth is and to not only know what your truth is, but to be able to see what your truth has been historically, so that you can more, you can refine it in a more empowered context, then the master key is going to open again in October. And it's going to walk you step by step through finding what you believe knowing how to track your feelings and beliefs and how they show up in your interactions. it'll teach you how to change what you believe, and it'll give you this huge arsenal of vocabulary to help you walk through the different layers of self awareness and all of your different interactions looking forward to having you in the container. Thank you so much for listening.
Annie Earhart:Until next time,